These personality types are creative nurturers helping others realize their potential. I's may prefer to think more rather than talk, but that doesn't mean they are better at thinking (in my experience). They have no emotional intelligence or intuition to give them an insight into the world. This chart was clearly made up by some random INTP guy. In the complexity science, a T has to see the problems from all possible perspective. He can grow up to invent things, get straight A's, and even influence the environment heavily all while being ISFP. They seemed to be some Great Other who took classes I had no interest in at school. The letters (traits) are nothing but to help the definition of the cognitive functions which are divided into Judging functions (Thinking extra/intro, Feeling extra/intro) and Perceiving functions (Intuition extra/intro, Sensing extra/intro). A problem I see here is that you're relying solely on your intuitions here but not actually paying any attention to the actual facts. Come one. Please read more about Jung cognitive functions and how Meyers & Briggs created types by combining them. All. INFP: Getting heartbroken one too many times. An INTP may spend more time developing those ideas, but less time sharing them with others. There are probably loads of them that could make the world a better place, but no one will listen because they are too logical and not in touch with "feelings". INTJs and ENTJs introvert feeling, often being seen as self-centered or cold, when really, they just get all emotional validation from within and don't see why everyone else can't, although that's an assumption. On the flip side, even though the feeler is using emotion the way that they are pulling the emotion through introversion is going to bring a great level of precision and accuracy. Often we'll question it if this isn't the case. I think I'll have another dorito..Yep! Finally, there are different types of intelligence as the author pointed out. Anyone who pushes past this and continues to ask long into adulthood is rare because it takes a certain character to do this. Problem-solving is a simple process, and complex theories make sense. Loretta Swit begged the writers to stop using it. I would put the smart P's and the smart J's pretty much in the same boat. Te and Si are middle off the road function both highly organised have decent memories especially Si types. If you want to create a stronger ranking of the types, I recommend basing it off the individual functions of each type, rather than on just the Big Four. And another one that is Istp. So what is actually going on? navigator.sendBeacon('https://www.google-analytics.com/collect', payload); My Ph.D. is in Social Science but, sounds like an oxymoron, relies heavily of very quantitative methods. Are Other Personality Types Less Intelligent? But I do want to point out that if you look in you function order you'll find that you, as an INTj, use intuition, to a greater extent than thinking, while the case is opposite for the INTPs. Also they mostly only care about themselves, meaning they are unlikely to store any information which doesnt relate to them. Who knew that a test comprised mostly of theoretical questions would cause an intuitive bias hmmm, Visual shape analysis and logic steps are not theoretical. Why don't I include the four humors? To another it may be interpersonal. They commonly work in religion, teaching, and the arts. Have a nice day. The second is inferential mainly, which is why INTPs are better at connecting the dots from apparently unrelated ideas, Both are equals. First of all, it just means that, based on IQ test results, if you have a group of 100 INTPs and a group of 100 people of all types, the INTPs will probably have four geniuses in the group when the other group has two. INTJs are supposed to be highly rational, always right but the IQ bell suggests that there are many INTJs with rather average IQs. Mammals can learn and make decisions based on what they learned. But are they really that much more intelligent or study that much harder? However, I see that my F as an exponential T where I can use my T from the persons perspective. I would estimate that roughly 85% of influence and intelligence can be ascertained through whether or not somebody is an S or an N. Following that we have E and I at around 10% which matters a lot, lot less than S/N. This Samuel individual is completely unnecessary. I was told by the membership director of Mensa that IQ and MBTI are not correlated. Id be really happy if you anwered me:). The I's get their energy on their own. But you will find that a majority of the studies points more towards those who are (I), those who are (N), those who are (T), and those who are (J). There is not one valid reason to support this. Thanks! No, just means the way her brain works is different from mine, so in some ways she would be the smarter one and point out illogical things which i say that contradicts previous data she received from me and in some ways i can point out things i see as irrational behaviour from her. The T is 14% and J is 10%. 13. Not surprising, Existential intelligence or thinking for its own sake is actually the primary life goal or purpose in life for INTPs. Other than this, great article! I agree completely with Khalil El Alami. This is the one big giveaway towards intelligence IMHO. -This analysis is inaccurate, yet somehow okay, but full of flaws -This has to have science to be right People who are lacking here are more likely to act on selfish whims and engage in archaic, 'animalistic' behavior. They can completely cut out time wasting emotional reactions and see logic, not only that they keep to themselves, storing even more information. I think each type and function has it's own unique brand of intelligence you know? Maybe I don't quite understand what's meant by influence being the marker for intelligence in this case, but I'm not sure I'd choose that as a unit anyways. But as soon as you say an N is more intelligent than an S everyone goes crazy. They are not thick in anyway and are actually smart and sensible people academically. We seek tools from high level Physics, Math, Stats, etc. Although they have little emotional intelligence I put them higher than ISFP because they can get things done much, much quicker than they can. Or an INTJ? A certain type of intelligence that you may actually be really good at because this isn't concrete, it all depends on perspective and who you really are. ENTP: Loss of respect for mankind in favor of the superiority of machines and technology. Absolutely. One of the rarest personality types, these individuals are incredibly adept at organizing. Everyone has their own strengths and weaknesses. So much for the poor research. Go on, I dare you. I'm an INTJ so don't think I'm just an S raging about how stupid I am. By holding on to this concept; before appointing it's substance as a substrate, perhaps it can help define the boundaries in which to progress. And I'm not even saying I'm right. In actuality, they were the only tie on the list. Not to argue or anything, but intuitives who believe in the possibilities of paranormal activity, psychics, etc, are probably smarter than those who don't because they can see how their perception of the world is only limited to what they can actually perceive instead of what there actually is. 13. ENTJs have this dominant ability of extroverted thinking, which puts them on the list of "most intelligent," according to Robledo. They are good at making people feel happy and are natural performers in art, drama or dance. When it comes to actual thinking, I can match (and usually far surpass) the I sitting in the corner reading. Other smarties to make the list are ESTJs. For example try to bring up the subject of "intuitive bias" within the MBTI Community and there would be RAGE and trolling immediately. This is awesome, thank you. However, your mistake is in thinking this applies to any Introvert who happens to be Intuitive. So who really is smarter? It is written for the people who read it and think to themselves, hmm, I've never really seen it that way before and this does make sense and fit in with a lot of the things I've researched as well. They are interested in the here-and-now and are more likely to focus on details than taking a broader view of things. INFJs are smart, but idealists by no means hold a candle to rationals. Intp seem to be more "spiritual". To another it may be mechanical. Once you come to that understanding, you will see that it is impossible to discern which specific cognitive functions contribute most to intelligence. Ni always wants to understand below the surface level and understand the deeper meaning. And these broad blanket statements and generalisations? Rather than wasting energy on a girlfriend. People have absolutely no problem -- no problem at all -- saying that a J is more organized than a P. They don't go, what about the cognitive functions? So intuatives are generally more intrested in learning than sensors. It's a general rule, and there are exceptions. Some time of situational external influence that I'm not even aware of? Would you type an ST on average as more intelligent than an NF? Personally I think I might give the edge to the xNxP types, but type doesn't really correlate much to intelligence. Anyway here is an interesting article about type intelligence. I end up doing this goofy test about twice a year and never know which I'll be. ENFJ- I think they are like INFPs in alot of ways in that they know people so well. As you can see most of this stuff doesn't matter that much except for S/N. I've known dull INTP's, ENTP's, and INTJ's. The N letter is the most important, making up 47% of intelligence, but I also believe introversion is important, making up 29%. This bar graph from Business Insider provides an important contrast to the previous one: Emotional Intelligence (EQ) is another measure of ones ability to fit into society and exhibit empathy. Get over yourself. Born leaders, these brilliant people are always working and thinking. N's are almost always more influential than S's. I am inclined to believe it is more related to being intuitive as opposed to being a sensor, since bullying seems so common among SFJs. They are not very good with analytical matters but they have a good idea on what to do in most circumstances. Culture and industry matters. and rank them based on your understanding or interpretation of "intelligence," then see which types have which functions as dominant. Might be I have some T in me because I often come to conclusion easily I barely or not recognise how my brain did that. ESTPs are energetic thrill seekers with a good sense of humor. 15 Dynamite Qualities Of A Dynamic Personality, 12 Of The Worst Negative Personality Traits That Are Truly Nasty, The Must-Know Differences Between A Sigma Male And Alpha Male. So how close is the ENT to the INT? INTP and INTJ are actually the precise opposite, which becomes clear when you learn the theory and stop basing things off the inaccurate tests. I don't know INTJs are smarter than INTPs or not, but they know how to use there intelligence in a usefull way, and that makes them usually more successful than us. When compared with their extroverted (and also intelligent) counterpart, the ENTP, people who have an INTP personality type "will be more interested in theories and logical systems that govern the world around them," Holweger says. Define Intelligence. Which MBTI is the smartest? Which Type Has the Most Geniuses? INTP So no matter what I will say, or anyone else will say, you will not be convinced that it is possible to rate intelligence. The smartest is INTP then INTJ and I don't know the order of the rest. Just because I'm a sensor am I some type of cow? Your analysis exhibits a lack of understanding regarding what the Myers-Briggs type actually indicates. It should be noted that there were only 8 types in Jung system (ETJ, EFJ, ITP, ESP, ENP, ISJ, INJ, IFP). Oddly, ISTJs comprise the second highest MBTI type among geniuses, so Im not sure I would say IQ tests are favorable to intuitives over sensors. Etc, etc. He described it as a "Two different ways to yield the same processing power" relationship. I believe that an ESFP can definitely be more intellectually successful than an INTJ. J's are generally more organized as compared to P's therefore viewed as much more reliable. Throughout my whole life I have enjoyed building real businesses by solving real problems. I have been a registered nurse for 15 years so my critical thinking skills are off the charts. I think INTPs are smarter than INTJs, because INTJs are only good at getting medals, getting ribbons, passing a test without even understanding most of the questions, self-admiring, speaking formal, big vocabulary, having blank stares, being inflexible whining like an ISFP half their age, and and relies on comprehensive context of an idea to understand it wholly. Wow. This is a different spin on smarts, but they're the invaluable people you want around when you're trying to put that complex furniture from IKEA together. TL;DR Intelligence comes in many different forms, you might rate it as you wish, but your rating will be greatly influenced by the way you and only you see things. INTP? :). Also as I said S types can be more intelligent than N types, just in a different manner. See, e.g., http://www.tecweb.org/styles/gardner.html. -INTP. They are good at consuming large amounts of information and solving analytical problems for widespread application. Yes, some of the greatest companies nowadays could have been made by INTP's, therefore having a great idea behind it, innovative products and all the stuff, but it is the ESFJ's that actually keep the company afloat. Dont forget it is a mean : The highest IQ now is VISHALINI (235) the indian girl INTP ; with Marilyn vos savant (228) who is INTP also. They are just not very good when it comes to storing long-term factual data or working things out. sorry but how the hell is an NF smarter than an NT? The analysis should deal with the cognitive functions and not the letters. Being smart isn't about being a thinker or being a feeler. If I had to give one an edge I would give a slight edge to P's as they are generally more involved with abstract things which are more primary and closer to a first cause than the more physical and real world things. And that is also why IQ tests are just one piece of intelligence. Well, I am anyway because that's how they break ties (for I and N over E and S), seeing as on the official test I scored dead even for both E/I and N/S. Hard to get work done when you keep procrastinating. How are you even alive? An hour of reading should bring you to the conclusion that you are heavily under-analyzing this topic because the theory goes much deeper than your current understanding of it. It makes them very determined and focused on whatever they want to do in life. ESTP- I would put them lower, but I put them here because they are very real world people, they have alot of common sense and do not put up with crap. You should dig a little deeper because you barely get past kiersey. Almost any N is going to have an edge over an S. So I would put N above S when it comes to who is smarter because the N has much more influence than the S. As stated earlier, this probably is about 85% of which MBTI is smarter. Introverts can be defined as 'measured' people. Maybe it's just best not to force an either/or choice on that one. This comes down to the task at hand. Dying as virgins for science is true dedication to nerdship. They are excellent at making decisions and they are always looking for ways to improve efficiency. I would agree with you, but for the most influential, i look upon ent, don't get this wrong I am Intp myself, but when it comes to reality, ent always the one that has a charge of anything, entj would be like natural born leader and entp would promote their thougts in charismatic way, well just my 2 cent. INTJ score high because of the J part. Most coordinated "Go for a business that any idiot can run - because sooner or later, any idiot probably is going to run it.". But with all this said I would still give the introverted feeler the upper hand. He is great at math and physics and able in abstract theology. They're just more likely to be intelligent in certain types of intelligence. However, after, not exaggerating, extremely painful physical/sickness and the affected extremely painful psychological journey, I start to see differently. They think very carefully before they speak and when they speak it is limited. I will point out that S types are probably more likely to succeed at an average intelligence or lower, around less than genius range at least, because they take better care of themselves, thus allowing them to be more physically stable, whereas the N types get caried away with dreams if they aren't intelligent enough to be as realistic as S types.

John Macarthur On The Chosen, Juice Fast Results, Articles S